Liquidity · Reviewed Aug 19, 2026 · 6 min read
How We Score Liquidity at CryptoExID
Observed depth, spread persistence and venue tier, scored on a dataset date. Not a live widget, and we say so.
Reviewed by CryptoExID Editorial · Aug 19, 2026 · Editorial policy · how we make money
What the number on our site means
Every exchange profile on CryptoExID carries a liquidity subscore from 0 to 10. Binance currently holds 9.9, Bybit 9.6, OKX 9.5, down through Gemini at 7.6, CEX.IO at 6.8 and Revolut at 6.6. This number is a considered judgment about execution quality, built from data we checked on a specific dataset date.
It is not a live feed. We do not publish an order-book widget, and we think pretending otherwise would be dishonest. Books change hour to hour; our score ranks venues on their demonstrated, persistent quality.
Input one: observed depth
The backbone of the subscore is depth observed on the venue's major pairs, measured in the standard 0.1% and 2% bands around mid price. We care about absolute dollar size, balance between bid and ask sides, and how depth on the venue's flagship pairs compares to peers on the same trading day.
Depth earns its position because it is expensive to fake. Resting orders can be hit by anyone at any moment, so a padded book puts real capital at risk in a way a spoofed volume ticker never does.
Input two: spread persistence
A snapshot spread flatters everyone. What separates venues is whether the spread stays tight through volatile hours, thin weekend sessions and news spikes. A market maker who pulls quotes at the first sign of movement leaves you with a beautiful average and a terrible fill exactly when you need one.
So we sample spreads across different market conditions rather than trusting a single calm-hour reading. Persistent tightness moves the score; a lucky screenshot does not.
Input three: venue tier
Depth and spread describe today. Venue tier describes resilience: the caliber of market makers on the platform, matching-engine reliability during cascades, and track record under stress. Upbit is a good illustration. It scores 9.1 largely on the strength of extraordinary KRW-pair books, a tier of liquidity that exists almost nowhere else.
Tier also catches manipulation risk. Venues with a history of inflated reporting take a haircut here even when a given day's book looks respectable.
How the subscore feeds the overall rating
In our base model, liquidity contributes 15% of an exchange's overall score, alongside fees, security, asset coverage and the rest. On liquidity-focused pages, where the reader has told us execution is what they care about, we reweight the same subscores so liquidity carries up to 40%.
Same data, different lens. A venue like MEXC with 0.00%/0.05% fees can top a fee-focused view while ranking lower here, and both views are true.
What we will not claim
We will not tell you the depth of a book right now, because we do not know it. We will not convert a subscore into a slippage estimate for your specific order, because that depends on the pair, the hour and the size. Use our score to shortlist venues; use the venue's own live book to plan the trade.
FAQ
Is the liquidity score updated in real time?
No. It is checked as of our dataset date and revised when we refresh the data. We deliberately do not run a live order-book widget, and every score should be read with that in mind.
What exactly goes into the subscore?
Three inputs: depth observed in the 0.1% and 2% bands on major pairs, spread persistence across different market conditions, and venue tier covering market-maker caliber and stress track record.
Why does liquidity weigh 15% in the base model?
Because for the median reader making mid-sized trades, fees, security and usability matter at least as much. Readers on our liquidity-focused pages get a reweighted view where it carries up to 40%.
Why does Upbit score 9.1 when it is mostly one currency?
Because within KRW pairs its depth is world-class, and the subscore rewards demonstrated depth where the venue actually operates. If you do not trade KRW pairs, that score is less relevant to you.
Can an exchange buy a better liquidity score?
No. The subscore is built from observed market data and our tier assessment. Commercial relationships do not touch the scoring inputs, and inflated self-reported volume actively hurts the tier component.